Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Thursday, August 18
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Media
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • Media
    • About
    Nalin Mehta
    You are at:Home » Blog » Why Amit Shah is wrong on JNU ‘anti-nationalism’ and Rahul Gandhi
    Politics & Current Affairs

    Why Amit Shah is wrong on JNU ‘anti-nationalism’ and Rahul Gandhi

    Nalin MehtaBy Nalin MehtaFebruary 15, 2016Updated:February 18, 2016No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    When BJP president Amit Shah launched his official website in August 2015, he dedicated his first blog to the founding father of Hindu nationalism, Veer Savarkar: the man who coined the term ‘Hindutva’ and whose 1920s book ‘Hindutva: Who is a Hindu’ remains a guiding bible for the movement. Shah, in his blog, called Savarkar his “ideal”, referred to his mantra of “one nation, one cultural value and nationalism” and asked people to join him in making the India of Savarkar’s dream.

    In his latest blog, on a day when JNU students and journalists were beaten up in Delhi’s Patiala House court while policemen just looked on, the BJP president waded directly into the JNU sedition row, accusing Rahul Gandhi of “no regard and love for the nation” and of backing “anti-national” elements. “I want to ask him (Rahul Gandhi) if his support for such slogans means that he has joined hands with the separatists,” Shah questioned. “Does he want to give a free hand to separatists in the name of freedom of expression and want another division of the country?”
    Directly gunning for Rahul, who attended the JNU protests, Shah also asks if the central government remaining a “mute spectator” in the “seditious activities” at JNU would been “in the interest in the nation?”

    img2

    With nationalism as its calling card, BJP is clearly looking to shore up its core constituency and to strike an emotional chord. Shah’s blog, home minister Rajnath Singh’s public direction to the police to go after “anti-national” elements and HRD minister Smriti Irani’s defence of “Mother India” all suggest that the government’s sledgehammer clampdown on political dissent was a political decision taken at the highest levels. This defence of narrow nationalism against any critique is both self-defeating and a political mistake.

    The crackdown on JNU, the arrest of student leader Kanhaiya Kumar and the slapping of sedition charges worryingly reflect a state that is willing to clamp down on democratic values in defence of a nationalism that it alone defines.

    However objectionable and wrong student slogans may be, there is no law that bans “anti-national” speech. From the 1962 Kedar Nath vs state of Bihar case to the 2015 Shreya Singhal vs Union of India case, the courts have repeatedly ruled that slogans and speeches cannot be considered seditious under Section 124 of the IPC unless they involve the direct and imminent incitement of violence.

    img3

    Even if the students were wrong, JNU authorities should have been left alone to deal with a campus problem. Union ministers wading in on campus tussles is over-reaction. India needs less regulation of university education, not more.

    Yet, the comment by RSS joint general secretary Dattatreya Hosabale that “all universities must be purged of all kinds of anti-national elements” suggests that instead of fixing the education system, the government may be focussing its energies on a cultural war.

    img4

    Focussing on a polarising debate on nationalism and going after its critics at a time when the Modi government needs the opposition to pass crucial legislation in the upcoming budget session is also bad political timing. It heralds a return to the BJP’s default instinct of Hindutva, which is not what it won its 2014 mandate for.

    It is BJP’s right to uphold Savarkar’s ideas as an ideology but subverting freedom of dissent, even misguided dissent, is a mistake in a democracy.

    Amit Shah BJP JNU Rahul Gandhi
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleWhy India has to fight the world’s most absurd war
    Next Article Patriotism, not hooliganism
    Nalin Mehta
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian media companies; international financing institutions like the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (ANU, La Trobe University), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (IIM Bangalore, Shiv Nadar University).

    Related Posts

    Nalin Mehta Writes: Three Reasons Why Experts Got It So Wrong on BJP in UP

    March 11, 2022

    Why Modi is the new Nehru for the Indian cultural right

    January 20, 2022

    Nalin Mehta Writes: How BJP Won the UP Caste Game and Why Scholars Got it Wrong

    January 8, 2022

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Tags
    2002 riots Army Asian Games BJP BSP China Commonwealth Games communal violence Congress corruption Cricket defence Delhi diplomacy education Godhra Gujarat Hindutva hockey Indian Army internal security international relations IPL Kashmir Mayawati media and politics military Modi Narendra Modi Nehru Olympics OROP Pakistan Parliament politics of sports Punjab Rahul Gandhi RBI Rio 2016 television terrorism United States UP Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
    Archives
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Don't Miss

    A new social evolution dawns on the Republic

    Why BJP’s Winning Muslim Seats

    Shiv Sena: Endangered Species

    Mehta’s Book Hits the Ground Running

    About

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems an Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian digital, print and TV news companies; been a communications expert with international financing institutions and the UN in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and India.

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS
    Recent Posts

    A new social evolution dawns on the Republic

    July 31, 2022

    Why BJP’s Winning Muslim Seats

    July 17, 2022

    Shiv Sena: Endangered Species

    July 16, 2022
    Tweets by ‎@nalinmehta

    Tweets by nalinmehta

    Copyright © 2022
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Media
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • Media
    • About

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.