Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Wednesday, November 5
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About
    Nalin Mehta
    You are at:Home » Blog » Whose Champions?
    In The Media

    Whose Champions?

    Nalin MehtaBy Nalin MehtaOctober 6, 2006Updated:April 1, 2015No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    It is the ICC’s mini-World Cup but there is no enthusiasm for it in the country of the current World Champions, Australia. Cricket fans in Australia are focused entirely on the “revenge” Ashes series that will follow the Champions Trophy. A survey of sports pages across Melbourne’s two biggest newspapers—The Age and The Australian—over the last two weeks bears this out. Since September 24, The Age has carried 25 stories devoted to cricket—only one featured the Champions Trophy and that article too focused on why nobody cares about the tournament. Similarly, The Australian, for the same period, totaled 38 articles on cricket, only three of which focused on the tournament. Newspapers don’t necessarily reflect the feelings of their readers (as many Indian journalists learnt in the debacle of their coverage of the India Shining campaign) but they are an important barometer of a country’s make-up. At the very least, they indicate what the cultural gatekeepers of the newspaper industry— reporters, editors, page designers— think is the national mood. In Australia, the media industry is so tuned to the Ashes, to the detriment of everything else, that news of former England captain Mike Gatting playing in a charity match in Japan this week has attracted more press coverage here than the ICC’s showpiece event. Reason: pictures of Gatting batting in Japan revived memories of Shane Warne’s “ball of the century” in 1993, giving headline-writers and sub-editors another spin to focus sport pages on the Ashes coverage.

    This dismal coverage of the lead-up to the Champions Trophy needs to be seen in light of the fact that unlike India, cricket itself is not the pre-eminent media sport in Australia. Australian Rules Football and Rugby occupy far more news space and the old imperial game is a distant third in the popularity stakes. In that sense, the total lack of interest in the Champions Trophy is somewhat similar to Australian apathy to the DLF Cup in Kuala Lumpur that their team won in September. That tournament again barely merited a mention in Australia’s sport pages. This fact was brought home to me when an Indian broadcast professional who has just joined the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in a senior position recounted to me his delight at finding that most Australians in his department at the ABC were cricket fanatics. But he was shocked when he realized that none of these “cricket fanatics” knew that their team had just won the DLF Cup, or indeed that such a tournament ever took place. The same “cricket fanatics” could recite to him players’ statistics, chapter and verse, for the upcoming Ashes series. This, to some extent, reflects older traditions of cricket as well as the changing nature of the global game where tournaments are being organized primarily for the Indian market. Older power centers like England and Australia have been left far behind in the brave new world of cricket.

    But there is another dynamic at play here as well. Unlike the Ashes, which have traditionally been beamed on television audiences on free-to-air channels like Nine (and most recently bySBS) the DLF Cup was aired on the pay service Foxtel. Cable television in Australia is very different to cable television in India. By Indian standards, the Australian cable industry is miniscule. Australia has about 1.66 million pay-TV subscribers (roughly 22% of TV households) In contrast, Indian satellite television reaches an estimated 68 million homes (roughly 61% of TV households). The point is that much fewer people in Australia have cable TV—in absolute and in comparative terms—and for any event to receive real public notice, it must be aired on one of the five free-to-air TV services: ABC, Nine, SBS, Seven or Ten. To be aired only on pay television is at best, a second option, and at worst, relatively bad for the business of any sporting event in Australia. The Champions Trophy too will air on the pay-for view Foxtel network as part of Rupert Murdoch’s deal with the ICC and will barely register on the Australian sporting radar. It is little wonder then that the Australian cricket team, on the eve of its departure for India had to answer questions on whether they even cared or if they were more worried about what one reporter called “the elephant in the corner,” the Ashes. Brett Lee’s answer was as politically correct as they come: “You just have to focus on the job at hand…The Champions Trophy is one we have never won and that is our most important series coming up. Then we will come home and focus on the Ashes after that.” But it was a thinly veiled statement and the very fact that the statement even had to be made is a reflection of how Australians view the Champions Trophy.

    If the Australians don’t care, who really cares for this tournament? Conventional wisdom says: India; and certainly the Indian media will hype this event and ride piggyback on the national passion for cricket. But even the Indian board doesn’t seem too interested because, as an ICC event, the financial bonanza from the telecast rights of this tournament will go to the ICC, not the BCCI. At a time when nearly 60% of the money that finances global cricket comes from Indian or India-focused companies, it is this dichotomy that underlies the current bout of hostilities between the BCCI and the ICC over players’ ambush marketing clauses for ICC-events. While the dispute is not about the Champions Trophy itself, it refers to corporate warfare over all such ICC-events and tensions are so high that ICC president Percy Sonn has even threatened the BCCI with taking away India’s right to host the 2011 World Cup. This particular battle, will no doubt, be resolved but the fact remains that outside of the sub-continental public, tournaments like the Champions Trophy do not really interest cricket fans elsewhere. As such, the only real utility of this tournament is to serve as a cash cow for the organizers. Of course, judging by past experience, if India does well in this tournament, the hype in the Indian press will break all bounds. Even if India wins, the central question remains: Whose champion is the Champions Trophy?

    Australia Champions Trophy Cricket media and sports
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleA Metaphor For Life
    Next Article Archive of Imagination: Chanakya on Camera: History, Television and Indian Nationalism
    Nalin Mehta
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Nalin Mehta is Managing Editor, Moneycontrol, Chief AI Officer - Editorial Operations, Network18 and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. He is an award-winning Indian journalist, political scientist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major media companies and educational institutions; served as an international civil servant with the UN and the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (La Trobe University, ANU), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (Shiv Nadar University, IIM Bangalore). Most recently, he has been Dean and Professor at School of Modern Media, UPES University. He has previously been Group Consulting Editor, Network18; Executive Editor, The Times of India-Online, Managing Editor, India Today (TV channel) and Consulting Editor, The Times of India. Mehta is the author of several best-selling and critically acclaimed books, including The New BJP: Modi and the Making of the World’s Largest Political Party (hailed as a ‘seminal’ work, No. 1 on Amazon’s bestseller lists for 26 consecutive weeks in 2022, and republished worldwide in several languages); India’s Techade: Digital Revolution and Change in the World’s Largest Democracy, India on Television (Asian Publishing Award for Best Book on Asian Media, 2009), Behind a Billion Screens (Longlisted as Business Book of the Year, Tata Literature Live, 2015) and Dreams of a Billion (2022 Ekamra Sports Book of the Year Award, co-authored). His edited books include Gujarat Beyond Gandhi (co-editor), Television in India and The Changing Face of Cricket (co-editor). Mehta is a DFID-Commonwealth scholar with a Ph.D in Political Science from Trobe University, Melbourne; M.A. International Relations from University of East Anglia, UK; and B.A. Journalism (Honours) from University of Delhi.

    Related Posts

    Emergence of a powerful PM was a turning point in India’s digital revolution

    October 31, 2023

    Numbers don’t lie: India’s success on the digital fronts sketched in celebratory detail

    October 17, 2023

    Moneycontrol Decodes PM Modi’s Mega Exclusive Interview

    September 6, 2023

    Comments are closed.

    Tags
    2002 riots Army Asian Games BJP BSP China Commonwealth Games communal violence Congress corruption Cricket defence Delhi diplomacy education Gujarat hockey Indian Army internal security international relations IPL Kashmir Mayawati media and politics military Modi Nalin Mehta Narendra Modi Nehru Olympics OROP Pakistan Parliament politics of sports Punjab Rahul Gandhi RBI Rio 2016 television terrorism The New BJP United States UP Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
    Archives
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Don't Miss

    India eyes partnership with France’s Safran to power next-gen Tejas Mk2 jets

    Modi’s big middle class outreach, tax changes to put more money in pocket: 5 political takeaways from Union Budget

    When Atal Bihari Vajpayee considered dissolving BJP: Story of how a young party found its footing

    BJP reverses Lok Sabha dip, Brand Modi shines again: Five poll takeaways for national politics

    BJP juggernaut and national politics: Seven takeaways for 2024 elections

    Exit polls: Five takeaways for national politics on road to 2024

    About

    Nalin Mehta is Managing Editor, Moneycontrol, Chief AI Officer - Editorial Operations, Network18 and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University of Singapore. He is an award-winning Indian journalist, political scientist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major media companies and educational institutions; served as an international civil servant with the UN and the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (La Trobe University, ANU), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (Shiv Nadar University, IIM Bangalore).

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS
    Recent Posts

    India eyes partnership with France’s Safran to power next-gen Tejas Mk2 jets

    August 23, 2025

    Modi’s big middle class outreach, tax changes to put more money in pocket: 5 political takeaways from Union Budget

    August 23, 2025

    When Atal Bihari Vajpayee considered dissolving BJP: Story of how a young party found its footing

    August 23, 2025
    Tweets by ‎@nalinmehta

    Tweets by nalinmehta

    Copyright © 2025
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.