Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Thursday, June 1
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About
    Nalin Mehta
    You are at:Home » Blog » IT’S ALL ABOUT THE GINI STUPID
    Public Policy

    IT’S ALL ABOUT THE GINI STUPID

    Nalin MehtaBy Nalin MehtaFebruary 14, 2011Updated:April 1, 2015No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Supreme Court’s direction to the CBI to treat the big fish among the corporate beneficiaries of the telecom scandal exactly the same as the nameless middle-level pawns has hit the nail upon the heart of the matter. At one level, this is about following the simple logic of the law. At a deeper level though, the observations go to the very core of the debate about corruption: the seething anger at a basic system of inequity that allows a handful of well-connected elites to manipulate it with impunity.

    For the middle classes, this shatters the mythology and the illusion of a meritocratic and just society.

    For those below them on the social scale, it gets subsumed within a larger narrative of everything being loaded against them, especially at a time when prices are rising spectacularly and the government seems powerless to do anything.

    A sense of unfairness is particularly palpable in a society where the inequalities are rising. It feeds existing malcontents and the fact is that for all our growth rates, India today is a much more unequal society than even 10 years ago.

    The most common economic method of measuring inequality is the ubiquitous Gini coefficient which operates on a scale of 0 to 1 (0 being a perfect score where everyone earns equally). The higher the Gini coefficient, the higher is the disparity and India’s Gini coefficient has risen from 0.32 in the mid-1980s to 0.36 in the mid-2000s.

    With inflation at an all-time high, it is no solace that most other big economies are facing the same problem of rising income disparities. The American Gini co-efficient, for instance, has gone up from 0.34 in the mid-1980s to 0.38 and China from 0.28 to 0.4.

    Even so, it was by no means inevitable that we should have been following the same broad trend. Brazil, for instance, is among the few that has been doing something right and has seen the opposite trend, with income inequalities actually reducing in the same period.

    The problem of equity is not just a moral issue of doing the right thing. When wealth gets disproportionally concentrated in the hands of few, it has catastrophic consequences. The current global economic crisis, which originated from the US, coincided with its most inequitable time in recent decades.

    According to the economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Picketty, the top 1 per cent of American households earned as much as 18.3% of national income in 2007.

    Their share had never been higher than 10% from the 1950s to the 1980s. Tellingly, the last time things were so unequal was in 1929, just before the Great Crash.

    The IMF’s former chief economist Raghuram Rajan has even argued that such inequalities directly led to the current financial crisis because politicians tried to paper over social divides by backing cheaper credit to those who couldn’t afford it.

    And it doesn’t need a Sherlock Holmes to deduce that the wider the wealth disparities in a society, the worse off it will be on social indicators, from life expectancy to crime.

    The global bestseller ‘The Spirit Level’, written by two British epidemiologists, crunches mountains of data to show how inequality affects everyone, in surprising ways.

    Human beings are such social animals that the feeling of being inferior causes chronic stress, leading to a range of pathologies when they find themselves at the bottom of the pyramid.

    For example, a study of British civil servants found that messengers, doormen and those with lower status were much more likely to die of heart disease and some cancers and had much worse health than others.

    Inequality undermines social trust and corrodes societies as a whole in obvious ways but also in unseen ways that we are just beginning to fathom.

    This is why we should be as worried about our deteriorating Gini coefficient as we are about 8% growth. And this is why the Supreme Court is absolutely right in reiterating that everyone is equal and no one Forbes list millionaires or otherwise should be considered above the law.

    corruption economic policy telecom
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleOF CAMELS, A YOUTH BULGE AND US
    Next Article OUR CELLPHONES AND US RAILROADS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian media companies; international financing institutions like the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (ANU, La Trobe University), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (IIM Bangalore, Shiv Nadar University).

    Related Posts

    How Muslims Fare in BJP’s Welfare Schemes

    January 14, 2022

    Why More Women Vote BJP

    January 7, 2022

    ‘We have tried to remove retrograde provisions and policies in J&K governance … militancy is slowly petering out’

    August 8, 2021

    Comments are closed.

    Tags
    2002 riots Army Asian Games BJP BSP China Commonwealth Games communal violence Congress corruption Cricket defence Delhi diplomacy education Gujarat Hindutva hockey Indian Army internal security international relations IPL Kashmir Mayawati media and politics military Modi Narendra Modi Nehru Olympics OROP Pakistan Parliament politics of sports Punjab Rahul Gandhi RBI Rio 2016 television terrorism The New BJP United States UP Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
    Archives
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Don't Miss

    CongNataka: Local pitch, rural vote script win

    Congress Dilemma after win.

    Karnataka Election Results: 10 Takeaways for National Politics After Congress Sweep Down South.

    Karnataka Elections: Why Rajiv Gandhi, Veerendra Patil And a 30-Year-Old Incident Feature in BJP vs Congress

    About

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems an Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian digital, print and TV news companies; been a communications expert with international financing institutions and the UN in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and India.

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS
    Recent Posts

    CongNataka: Local pitch, rural vote script win

    May 15, 2023

    Congress Dilemma after win.

    May 14, 2023

    Karnataka Election Results: 10 Takeaways for National Politics After Congress Sweep Down South.

    May 13, 2023
    Tweets by ‎@nalinmehta

    Tweets by nalinmehta

    Copyright © 2023
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.