Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Thursday, June 1
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About
    Nalin Mehta
    You are at:Home » Blog » Our security setup is stuck in Mountbatten-Ismay era
    Politics & Current Affairs

    Our security setup is stuck in Mountbatten-Ismay era

    Nalin MehtaBy Nalin MehtaJanuary 10, 2016Updated:February 2, 2016No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Raj relic: Security is not an electoral issue in India and few netas understand it
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The NSG is not Rambo. If Pathankot proved anything, it was this. Unlike chest-thumping, Rambo-type films or what passes for fighting terror in Hindi films like Holiday, defence operations are extremely complex and, when they go wrong, highly emotive. By now, everything that needed to be said about the Pathankot attack has been said — why the Army was not in charge, the absence of single command-and-control, the need for NSG when crack Army Special Forces were nearby, the failure of Punjab Police, NSA Ajit Doval’s crisis management and the embarrassing ministerial free-for-all in the government’s communications policy. We are now habituated to this drill of despair. Each big terror attack brings an avalanche of such tactical questions. They wring our collective consciousness till the news cycle moves on, only to return again with the next attack. Deeper questions on India’s security management never really get debated.

    Everyone salutes those who fought and died. Yet, patriotism and gratitude alone cannot substitute hard-nosed self-examination. The bitter truth is that India’s security management is still run almost exactly as it was designed by two British grandees in 1947: Lord General Hastings Lionel Ismay and Lord Louis Mountbatten. The first baron of Ismay, Churchill’s military assistant in World War II, designed independent India’s defence framework as chief of staff to Viceroy Mountbatten who, in turn, recommended it to Nehru. The new Indian leadership, unfamiliar with the intricacies of managing national security, put this system in place 69 years ago and there it remains even today. Babudom and the absence of a strategic culture among the political class made it worse over the decades.

    The Kargil Review Committee (KRC), set up by the last BJP government, concluded in 2000 that since the Ismay-Mountbatten jugalbandi, “there has been very little change over the past 52 years, despite the 1962 debacle, the 1965 stalemate, the 1971 victory, the growing nuclear threat, end of the cold war, continuance of proxy war in Kashmir for over a decade and the revolution in military affairs.” These words ring true even today, despite serious calls for change after every big security disaster.

    After Kargil, both the KRC and the subsequent GoM on National Security, chaired by L K Advani and comprising the ministers of defence, finance and external affairs, found serious deficiencies in India’s defence management and intelligence structure in Delhi. The GoM concluded on February 19, 2001 that the “apparatus and systems we have inherited from the British are no longer suitable in this day and age”, asking for sweeping changes.

    These included creating a joint Chief of Defence Staff for single-point military advice to government, integrating service headquarters into ministry of defence (instead of the current practice of them being “attached offices”) like in all major democracies, setting up of a Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and a National Defence University. Apart from DIA, bureaucratic resistance ensured that none of these are a reality even today.

    Similarly, after 26/11, P Chidambaram as UPA’s home minister pushed for creating NATGRID, aiming to combine 21 databases for 11 security agencies. UPA’s cabinet committee on security allocated Rs 1,003 crore for its first phase in 2012. In 2014, it was given two more years for completion. Eight years after 26/11, NATGRID is still not functional. Among the delaying reasons: its official building got environmental clearance only two years after its foundation stone was laid!

    In contrast, the US created the department of homeland security after an internal government revamp within two years of 9/11. It still publishes updates on implementation of the 9/11 Commission. Even China, a non-democracy, has published nine white papers on defence since 1998.
    India is the world’s largest arms importer, but without an internal overhaul all this looks like ‘arming without aiming’, to borrow from the title of a telling book by Stephen Cohen and Sunil Dasgupta. India’s problem is that security is not an electoral issue. Few politicians understand defence matters. The KRC and Advani panel reports were tabled in Parliament but never debated. The BJP’s 2014 manifesto looked to change this with an unusually high defence focus in a section called “Secure Indians — zero tolerance on terrorism, extremism and crime”. Those promises need fulfilment.

    The Nirbhaya case showed how public anger can force politicians to act, forcing the passage of two legislations. We now need similar pressure on defence. Parliament must debate the KRC’s recommendations and change our national security structure. India needs this and our soldiers deserve it.

    Indian Army Kargil Pathankot
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleHow President Obama indirectly helps North Korea’s nuclear rise with “ally” Pakistan
    Next Article How ‘Jake sweetie’ conquered Dhaka for India
    Nalin Mehta
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian media companies; international financing institutions like the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (ANU, La Trobe University), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (IIM Bangalore, Shiv Nadar University).

    Related Posts

    CongNataka: Local pitch, rural vote script win

    May 15, 2023

    Karnataka Election Results: 10 Takeaways for National Politics After Congress Sweep Down South.

    May 13, 2023

    Karnataka Elections: Why Rajiv Gandhi, Veerendra Patil And a 30-Year-Old Incident Feature in BJP vs Congress

    May 2, 2023

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Tags
    2002 riots Army Asian Games BJP BSP China Commonwealth Games communal violence Congress corruption Cricket defence Delhi diplomacy education Gujarat Hindutva hockey Indian Army internal security international relations IPL Kashmir Mayawati media and politics military Modi Narendra Modi Nehru Olympics OROP Pakistan Parliament politics of sports Punjab Rahul Gandhi RBI Rio 2016 television terrorism The New BJP United States UP Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
    Archives
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Don't Miss

    CongNataka: Local pitch, rural vote script win

    Congress Dilemma after win.

    Karnataka Election Results: 10 Takeaways for National Politics After Congress Sweep Down South.

    Karnataka Elections: Why Rajiv Gandhi, Veerendra Patil And a 30-Year-Old Incident Feature in BJP vs Congress

    About

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems an Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian digital, print and TV news companies; been a communications expert with international financing institutions and the UN in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and India.

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS
    Recent Posts

    CongNataka: Local pitch, rural vote script win

    May 15, 2023

    Congress Dilemma after win.

    May 14, 2023

    Karnataka Election Results: 10 Takeaways for National Politics After Congress Sweep Down South.

    May 13, 2023
    Tweets by ‎@nalinmehta

    Tweets by nalinmehta

    Copyright © 2023
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.