Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Monday, June 16
    Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn RSS
    Nalin Mehta
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About
    Nalin Mehta
    You are at:Home » Blog » Who cares if Sachin Tendulkar doesn’t talk
    Politics & Current Affairs

    Who cares if Sachin Tendulkar doesn’t talk

    Nalin MehtaBy Nalin MehtaAugust 8, 2014Updated:April 5, 2015No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The last time a government was really worried about the attendance of a nominated Rajya Sabha MP was when Pramod Mahajan as Minister of Parliamentary Affairs pulled out all stops to get Lata Mangeshkar to fly down from Mumbai and cast her vote during the special combined sitting of Parliament convened by the Vajpayee government to pass the Prevention of Terrorism Act.

    Lata didi flew down that time but did little else of note (including attending sessions) during her time as a nominated member of the upper house. The furore over Sachin Tendulkar’s non-attendance now has once again focused attention on the role of nominated MPs: are they meant to bring their expertise to bear on questions of national importance or are they mere ornamental eye-candy, passive beneficiaries of the propensity of cynical governments to score a few brownie points by nominating those whom they see as public heroes.

    This has always been a dubious political logic — nobody votes for you just because you nominate a Sachin or a Lata — but the nominated members are expected at the very least to bring in domain expertise and a different perspective to governance debates.

    The first batch of 12 nominated members in the Rajya Sabha, for example, included scholar and educationist Dr Zakir Husain, the historians Dr Kalidas Nag and Dr Radha Kumud Mookerji, national poet Maithilisharan Gupta, Gandhian author Kakasaheb Kalelkar, eminent scientist Professor Satyendranath Bose, dancer Rukmini Devi Arundale, Gandhian scholar and teacher, Dr JM Kumarappa, legal luminary Dr Alladi Krishnaswami and the actor Prithviraj Kapoor.

    Many of these made erudite interventions in Parliamentary debates. Zakir Husain went on to become President but hardly anybody today would remember Prithviraj Kapoor as a Parliamentarian. The legendary actor went on to become a memorable Akbar in Mughal-e-Azam, but politics remains a forgotten footnote in his career. Or for that matter, in that of MF Hussain, another nominated Rajya Sabha MP in recent years who hardly ever turned up.
    So what is the big fuss about Sachin’s non-appearances? He is hardly the first MP not to take his attendance duties seriously. And in a Parliament full of non-performers does it really merit such a hue and cry?

    The difference is that for most other lesser-known MPs, non-performance or non-attendance is simply not noticed. But if you are Sachin, it gives the media a convenient talking point, channels get to loop his footage constantly and it is easy to conjure up what appears to be another national scandal involving yet another politician.
    It is instructive to compare Sachin’s performance with those of other nominated members in this Rajya Sabha. Attendance is not the only barometer of performance and if you look at the record of other independent nominated members in this Rajya Sabha not many have really been outspoken speakers, intervening in debates and acting as a sort of moral conscience in the way that Shabana Azmi did for a while.

    Going by records made public by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat on its website, only HK Dua and KTS Tulsi have regularly asked questions to ministers. The record shows that others like Anu Agha, Rekha and even Javed Akhtar have never officially put forth questions to government (as opposed to attending or participating in debates).

    If you look at money spent by these MPs on their designated constituencies, only HK Dua (South Delhi) and Ashok Ganguly (Mumbai City) have spent all the money sanctioned so far to them, Anu Agha (Pune) and Bhalchandra Mungekar (Sindhudurg) have spent around 70% of the funds released and B. Jayashree (Bangalore Urban) nearly 80%.
    Further down the order, Javed Akhtar (Mumbai Suburban) and Mrinal Miri (Kamrup Metropolitan) have only spent around 30% while K Parasaran (Chennai) has managed to spend a paltry 4% of the money sanctioned so far.

    Rekha and KTS Tulsi have not opted for districts yet while Sachin can spend money on Mumbai Suburban but the 15 crore available for him hasn’t yet been made available.
    Among the present cohort, those like Javed Akhtar may not directly revel in the cut and thrust of parliamentary debate but certainly weighs in often enough in the public space on ongoing issues.
    No one really expected Sachin to set Raisina Hill abuzz but he did raise expectations just after his nomination by presenting a sports development plan to the then-government. Much like he single-handedly shouldered the burden of Team India for years, there was an unreal expectation that somehow he would don his saviour cape and act as a much-needed advocate in Parliament for India’s much-neglected sportsmen and women.

    The real grouse with Sachin is not that he has not emerged as a leading Parliamentarian in the technical sense but that he has never used his stature to act as a moral weathervane to steer policy debates on sporting issues in the right direction.
    Even when he was playing and captained India, most of his fans had the same problem with him. He was the undisputed star on the field, but off the field, India always hoped that someday he would break free of his self-imposed shackles, speak up freely on cricketing issues and set the agenda. Instead, his style was always to let his bat do the talking and to take the quiet, uncontroversial, safe route off the pitch.

    Now, of course, he is no batting anymore and we are expecting him to do without the bat what he has never done before.

    All of India would sit up and applaud if he does decide to change direction and throws his public caution and seeming indifference to the winds but a lifetime’s habits are hard to brush off and perhaps its asking for too much.

    Sachin didn’t ask to be made a Rajya Sabha MP and perhaps we should just be satisfied with what we have. So what if Sachin doesn’t want to talk or come to Parliament. At least he could bat!

    Parliament Rekha Sachin
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleGlasgow shows Delhi’s false dawn
    Next Article Phoolan Devi: The righteous daku
    Nalin Mehta
    • Website
    • Twitter

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems and Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian media companies; international financing institutions like the Global Fund in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia (ANU, La Trobe University), Singapore (NUS), Switzerland (International Olympic Museum) and India (IIM Bangalore, Shiv Nadar University).

    Related Posts

    BJP juggernaut and national politics: Seven takeaways for 2024 elections

    December 3, 2023

    Exit polls: Five takeaways for national politics on road to 2024

    November 30, 2023

    G20: India’s new soft power is digital public infrastructure

    September 11, 2023

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Tags
    2002 riots Army Asian Games BJP BSP China Commonwealth Games communal violence Congress corruption Cricket defence Delhi diplomacy education Gujarat hockey Indian Army internal security international relations IPL Kashmir Mayawati media and politics military Modi Nalin Mehta Narendra Modi Nehru Olympics OROP Pakistan Parliament politics of sports Punjab Rahul Gandhi RBI Rio 2016 television terrorism The New BJP United States UP Uttar Pradesh West Bengal
    Archives
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    • LinkedIn
    Don't Miss

    BJP juggernaut and national politics: Seven takeaways for 2024 elections

    Exit polls: Five takeaways for national politics on road to 2024

    Notes and Appendices: The New BJP

    Emergence of a powerful PM was a turning point in India’s digital revolution

    About

    Professor Nalin Mehta is Dean, School of Modern Media, UPES; Advisor, Global University Systems an Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Institute of South Asian Studies, National University Singapore. He is an award-winning social scientist, journalist and author who has held senior leadership positions in major Indian digital, print and TV news companies; been a communications expert with international financing institutions and the UN in Geneva, Switzerland; taught and held research positions at universities and institutions in Australia, Singapore, Switzerland and India.

    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn RSS
    Recent Posts

    BJP juggernaut and national politics: Seven takeaways for 2024 elections

    December 3, 2023

    Exit polls: Five takeaways for national politics on road to 2024

    November 30, 2023

    Notes and Appendices: The New BJP

    November 6, 2023
    Tweets by ‎@nalinmehta

    Tweets by nalinmehta

    Copyright © 2025
    • Home
    • The New BJP
    • Books
    • Columns
      • Politics & Current Affairs
      • Sports
      • Public Policy
    • Videos
    • Research Articles
    • In The Media
    • About

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.